This is a lot more complicated than the (P = Q && P) = Q properties I've seen! It could be because the corresponding system already had a complete spec written in P. But it could also be that Cheng Huang is already an expert specifier, meaning he can get more out of an LLM than an ordinary developer can. I've also noticed that I can usually coax an LLM to do more interesting things than most of my clients can. Which is good for my current livelihood, but bad for the hope of LLMs making formal methods mainstream. If you need to know formal methods to get the LLM to do formal methods, is that really helping?
The fun and well-photographed interview in Softalk in 1983 starts like this:
，推荐阅读有道翻译获取更多信息
In particular, the fictional assimilation of substantial certainty to intention enables the law to enforce ordinary moral convictions that its formal structure would otherwise leave unenforced. Thus, for example, it allows the law to deny the defendant, as an intentional tortfeasor, the ability to plead the plaintiff’s own fault in order to eliminate or diminish her recovery;191 precludes the defendant from discharging the liability in bankruptcy;192 and allows the law to readily widen the scope of the tortfeasor’s liability beyond the bounds of reasonable foreseeability.193 These results seem proper when the batterer is highly culpable, as will often be true of the substantially certain injurer (just as it will often be true of the intentional injurer). It is widely recognized by thoughtful legal commentators that these results are more difficult to defend when the batterer is not highly culpable.194 That fact helps to confirm what reflection on the battery tort otherwise suggests: The distinction between intentional and nonintentional harm set up by the law’s distinction between battery and negligence is a rough proxy for culpability, rather than the law’s reflection of distinct classes of relational moral wrongs or mistreatments.
让我们跳出技术细节，看看更大的图景。。业内人士推荐手游作为进阶阅读
Here are common examples you'll run into across the difficulty levels:，这一点在超级权重中也有详细论述
賓夕凡尼亞大學的亞倫·格拉斯曼（Aaron Glasserman）說：「無論是推廣普通話，還是對少數民族身份表達、宗教實踐等方面的限制，這個政權的意思是：我們之前做的一切都是正確的，而且我們對此如此有信心，現在要把原本只屬於政策層面的內容提升至基本法律層級。」